Molarray Healthcare

Industry

Healthcare

Time

May 2022 - Aug 2022

Scope of Work

Branding | Product Design | Saas Product

Team

1 Team Lead, 1 designer, 8 developers

Introduction

Molarray is a biotech company specializing in liquid handling systems for diagnostic testing and research. Our systems simplify the analysis of biological samples for genetic mutations, infectious diseases, and cancer diagnosis. As the sole designer, I led the design of a healthcare application interface for molecular diagnosis products and digital screens, designed an operational dashboard to simplify user flow, and conducted user research through collaboration with stakeholders.

Problem Statement

Preliminary Interview

After conducting interviews with key stakeholders, including research scientists, technologists in the diagnosis department, and the company's QA team, it became evident that Molarray's liquid handling system was posing challenges in terms of usability issue, leading to significant training and installation costs. The dashboard proved to be particularly cumbersome for users, resulting in frequent errors. Additionally, we collaborated with the business owner and identified that these usability were also impeding the product's entry into the broader market, resulting in revenue limitations. To address these challenges, we conducted further research to analyze the problem.

Aligning Expectations

Stakeholder Opinions

Importance of listening to stakeholder requirements:

  • Understand user needs and business goals
  • Address pain points and prioritize requirements

Success Matrix

Our Design Goal

After the interview with all the stakeholders, we determined that the main design goal for us is to improve the usability of use of the liquid handling system and increase the efficiency of the system by reducing the time it takes for users to complete tasks. Below are few matrix we used to measure our design success matrix.

Usability

  • task completion time,
  • error rate
  • user satisfaction scores

Efficiency

  • Measure the efficiency of the system by tracking the time it takes for users to complete tasks
  • Calculating the time it takes to set up run experiments using the system.

Research

Persona

Main User Type

Laboratory Technicians (Over 70%)
Perform diagnostic testing and analysis of biological samples, such as blood or tissue samples, for genetic mutations, infectious diseases, or cancer diagnosis.

User Needs

Safety: June wants to feel safe and protected from biological hazards while handling large quantities of samples.
Efficiency: June values fast and efficient operation of the machine to save time and improve productivity.
Simplified Preparations: June finds the preparations for experiments cumbersome and desires a more streamlined process.
Continuous Operation: June faces issues with the machine pausing halfway during experiments, leading to the need to restart all analyses.

User Journey Map

Key Findings

  • Users encounter the greatest challenges during the set-up and process steps, which result in the highest number of operational errors reported in these stages.
  • The login and sample disposal steps, on the other hand, were generally straightforward and did not present significant hurdles.
  • While the check result step posed some challenges, it was relatively less demanding compared to the set-up and process steps.


Usability testing revealed challenges for Molarray users, including low task completion rates and operational errors. Interface changes may be necessary to improve efficiency and productivity.

To gain a deeper understanding of the existing system, we conducted user research on the exisitng interfaces to identify the specific problems users encounter while conducting experiments.

User Journey Map on the Existing Interfaces

User Research

Usability Testing

Key Findings

  • Only 33% of participants were able to successfully complete tasks on the Molarray liquid handling system after training.
  • The machine is fast and efficient for large-scale operations, but researchers need to monitor the experiment process.
  • If the experiment process is paused, the entire process needs to be restarted.
  • The product needs accesibility improvement.

Based on these findings, it's clear that improvements are needed in the set-up and process steps to make the liquid handling system more user-friendly and reduce operational errors.

Prioritize the Work

  • Rebuilding the workflow to optimize efficiency
  • Revamping the setup instructions to ensure ease of useImproving the customer's experimental setup experience by publishing a user guide and providing intuitive templates
  • Adding a machine operation monitoring screen to enhance system performanceRefining the data dashboard and presenting clear results for easy interpretation.

Design Process

Re-build the Workflow

To enhance the design, my initial step involved gaining a comprehensive understanding of the current system's workflow. By conducting a card-sorting test, we restructured the Information Architecture, reorganizing the presentation of information on the sidebar and floating bars. The previous sitemap primarily showcased the machine's usage, whereas the updated sitemap places greater emphasis on ensuring the successful execution of the workflow.


Furthermore, I made significant improvements to the workflow. In the previous version, the machine was divided into three sections, necessitating the technician to set it up 3 separate times. However, by aligning with the mindset of the biological technician and their experimental approach, I consolidated the workflow into a single streamlined process for setting up the protocol.

The chart below illustrates the simplification of the process, transitioning from 3 separate set-up processes to a unified and integrated approach guided by step wizards. This visual representation helps to clearly demonstrate the enhanced efficiency and user-friendliness of the new system.

Wireframe

To improve the user flow of the liquid handling system, I collaborated with the software development team to adopt a step-by-step approach for experiment setup. This approach minimized the impact on the development team and maximized adaptability for the UX team. The wireframe includes solutions such as:

  • A clear and simple step-by-step wizard to guide the user through the experiment setup process
  • Prominent "Next Step" button to inform the user of the next required action
  • Obvious instructions that guide the technologist to properly place the sample
  • Confirmation page double-checks all input information before starting the experiment.
  • Use of simple language and visual cues to make the setup process accessible for users

Design Result

Workflow

Step 1 - 4
  1. Experiment Set-up
  2. Protocol Set-up
  3. Sample & Tip Placement
  4. Confirmation

Step 5 - 6

  1. Monitor
  2. Result

Before Interfaces

After Interface

Prototype

Discover multiple solutions and deliver the final version that fits the developer habit and coding convention. The final version integrated the updated style guide and improve the accessbility.

Key Take-away

Key Take-away

Improve the UX maturity

To educate the importance of UX, I listened to feedback from different departments within the company and actively used my UX skills to solve their problems. By doing so, I was able to improve the overall UX maturity of the company and lay a solid foundation for the team to adapt to user-friendly design and development. Some key takeaways from this process include:

  • Actively seeking out feedback and insights from different teams and stakeholders
  • Using my UX expertise to solve their problems and address pain points
  • Fostering a culture of user-centered design and development within the company
  • Continuously iterating and improving upon UX processes and practices to further increase UX maturity

Improve in future if have chance

  1. Validate the design with more user
  2. Collect and analysis quant and quali data to support the dashboard display
  3. Refine the design system
  4. Build a design culture across departments